Topic: |
VFD & Government Agency Found Liable for FF Deaths (1 of 2), Read 40 times |
Conf: |
EMERGENCY RESPONSE - LESSONS LEARNED |
From: |
Dennis Gifford - ICQ 31637891 giffordd@aol.com |
Date: |
Saturday, July 03, 1999 02:28 PM |
EXCELLENT learning tool here at too great an expense
to two of our fellow firefighters.
Read on good people, this
exposure looms around us all everyday and at every call. The ONLY
difference now is you've been warned. So how YOU handle it from NOW ON?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subj: VFD &
Government Agency Found Liable
Date: 7/3/99 12:29:42 PM CDT
From: JMBuckman
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subj: VFD & Government Agency Found Liable for Firefighter Deaths
Date: 7/2/99 2:20:32 PM US EST
From: FW06237@MSXWHWTC.shell.com
(Windisch, Fred FC SCC)(Ponderosa VFD in Houston,TX.)
A REASON
FOR GOOD MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS
A REASON FOR GOOD COMMAND
A
REASON FOR QUALITY PEOPLE
A REASON FOR GREAT LEADERSHIP
A REASON
FOR GREAT TRAINING AND QUALFICATIONS OF OUR MEMBERS
(but it
will "never" happen to any of us..........)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the Texas Fire Chiefs Friday Report
VFD and Government Agency Found Liable for Firefighter Deaths
By
Bobby R. Young
Few Volunteer Fire Departments (VFDs) can handle
large brush and grass fires without the help of neighboring departments
who respond routinely under Mutual Aid Agreements. A recent federal court
ruling in Idaho could seriously affect helping each other and place both
receiving and sending departments under scrutiny.
On July 28,
1995, two members of Kuna VFD were killed while fighting a grass fire on
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land in Idaho. The fire was started by
lightning and burned in dense, high, dead grass. The temperature was in
the high 90s and the wind was blowing 40 mph. Kuna VFD responded with a
tanker and a brush truck. The tanker was operated by experienced
personnel, while the brush truck was occupied by two firefighters
experiencing their first fire season.
Upon arrival at the fire,
no effort was made to split up the VFD crews and both units were deployed
on the fire. The Kuna VFD chief could not communicate with the brush truck
due to the crews inexperience with the radio. This unit did not hear
the BLM warning of increasing winds. The brush truck driver became
disoriented in the dust and smoke and the truck was overrun by fire,
killing both of the inexperienced firefighters.
A suit was filed
in Federal Court in Idaho and the ruling, handed down in January 1999,
found that BLM was 35% responsible and that the Kuna VFD was 65%
responsible for the deaths. These are the reasons BLM was found
responsible:
1. BLM should have assigned duties commensurate
with ability.
2. By assuming command and directing the
volunteers without knowledge of their
qualifications, BLM did not
comply with their own standard to assure the safety of firefighters.
3. BLM made no effort to ascertain volunteer qualifications.
4. When BLM makes assumptions of qualifications, BLM increases their
responsibility in assuring safety.
5. The Court ruled that the
mere dispatch of personnel by a VFD does not entitle BLM to assume
qualifications to do anything.
6. BLM had the duty to instruct
the VFD about safety, nature of fire, fuels, weather, etc. which it did
not do.
7. BLM had the duty to make sure that all firefighters
heard the weather warning and that volunteers understood the significance
of the warning. This was not done.
Kuna VFD was found to be
liable because of failure to: assure the safety of their firefighters;
provide adequate equipment; make safe assignments; obtain a weather
report; provide safety training; and advise BLM of firefighters'
qualifications.
This case will have a far-reaching effect on how
mutual aid is handled. At the very least, if command is assumed at a
scene, you must make a reasonable effort to determine the qualifications
of responders. You must make sure that cooperators are aware of fuels,
weather, predicted fire behavior, radio frequencies, etc. before placing
them out on the fire line. It is also the responsibility of the responding
unit's ranking officer to inform the receiving unit of each person's
qualifications, and to assure the safety of their personnel. While this
case involved a wildland fire, the same scenario could have occurred on a
structure fire.
Please contact Bobby R. Young, Associate
Director, Texas Forest Service, PO Box 310, Lufkin TX 75902 or email
jamen@inu.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forward by
Dennis M. Gifford - ICQ 31637891
District Chief -
Lumberton Volunteer Fire & Rescue, Lumberton, TX.
http://home.fireservice.com/lumbertontx
President - Hardin County Fire Fighter's Association
2nd VP - East
Texas Firemen's & Fire Marshal's Association
http://www.etffma.org